Chestertons v Nurmohamed
This case tested the meaning of “in the public interest” in relation to whistleblowing and contrasts with the Newman case below.
Mr Nurmohamed was a director of the estate agency, Chestertons. He claimed to have been unfairly dismissed after making protected disclosures relating to the company’s financial matters. He believed that Chestertons was deliberately mis-stating costs and liabilities, and that that affected the earnings of 100 senior managers, including himself.
The tribunal held that he had been unfairly dismissed and automatically unfairly dismissed, and had been subjected to detriments on the grounds that he had made protected disclosures. A question for the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) was whether the disclosures satisfied the “public interest” requirement, triggering protection. Did disclosures which were in the interest of 100 managers do the trick?
The EAT held that the public interest test comes down to the discloser’s belief. In this case, Mr Nurmohamed reasonably believed that the disclosure was in the public interest. A relatively small group may be sufficient to satisfy the public interest test, the EAT said.
It’s something to bear in mind. Don’t assume that just because an issue may not be of significance to people outside your organisation that its relevance to a particular group won’t lead to a protected disclosure.
- Agency Workers
- Case Studies
- Allegations of Sexual Abuse
- Associations with those convicted of a serious criminal offence
- Diabetes and Disability
- Human Rights
- Knowledge of Disability
- Reasonable Adjustments
- Reasonable Adjustments and Time Limits
- Religion & Belief
- Requirement of formal interview is disability discrimination
- Restrictive Covenants
- Right to be Accompanied
- Sexual orientation
- Social Media
- Strike Outs
- Time Limits
- Unfair Dismissal
- Voice Recording Meetings
- Worker Status
- Working Time
- A new flexible working culture for the UK?
- Discrimination Questionnaires bite the dust
- Disqualification by association
- Employment Tribunal Fees
- Mandatory ACAS Conciliation?
- Massive reduction in ET Claims
- New Regulations
- Obese Employees and Disability
- Partners' New Rights to Attend Ante-Natal Appointments
- Pensions auto-enrolment
- Redundancy and Maternity Leave
- Shared Parental Leave
- SSP no longer reclaimable by Employers
- The European Court of Justice says: 'holiday pay must include commission'
- UK Constitution
- Unfair Dismissal Compensation
- Without Prejudice and Protected Conversations
- Zero Hours Contracts